Find a Course

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 10/14

Posted on October 15, 2019 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy. 

WHO: A federal naval air weapons facility
WHERE: China Lake, CA
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $23,700

A naval air weapons research and development facility has agreed to pay $23,700 in RCRA fines for allegedly failing to keep hazardous waste containers closed and properly manage universal wastes. EPA also alleges the facility failed to comply with a permit condition that requires deteriorating containers to be replaced or put inside larger containers in good condition at the point of generation.

Under RCRA regulations, hazardous waste containers must always be closed during accumulation, except when necessary to add or remove waste (see 40 CFR 262.17(a)(1)(iv)(A)).

EPA identified these alleged violations, as well as others, during an inspection in 2018. The facility has since resolved the violations and is now in compliance. Operations at the facility include research and development of explosive materials and weapons, aircraft maintenance, metal fabrication operations, and storage of hazardous waste. 

WHO: A petroleum refinery
WHERE: Bradford, PA
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $350,000 plus $4.5 million in equipment improvements

As part of an administrative consent agreement, a Pennsylvania petroleum refinery will pay a six-figure penalty for alleged violations of its operating permit issued by the State Department of Environmental Protection and noncompliance with Federal Clean Air Act regulations. As part of the settlement, the company has agreed to replace its coal-fired boiler and an associated fuel gas recovery system.

Alleged violations include failure to properly operate an emission-reducing flare; failure to comply with equipment leak detection and repair (LDAR) safeguards; failure to comply with performance requirements for petroleum storage vessels; and failure to comply with national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for industrial boilers.

WHO: A mobile fast food restaurant
WHAT: Safe Drinking Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $62,143

EPA alleges that a food truck in Hawaii failed to close three large-capacity cesspools. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA banned large-capacity cesspools in 2005. In 2017, the state of Hawaii passed legislation requiring all cesspools to be replaced by 2050.

The restaurant company has agreed to connect to nearby sewer lines by the end of 2019 as part of the settlement.


Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 

The nationwide schedule, now with 2020 dates, for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is available online. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.